QUOTE(Ebrahim Hassanzadeh @ 23 Jan 2010, 22:12)
-206 has a better electrical (multiplex) system than Logan.
electrical system on the 206 is not much better only because it has CAN-BUS.
Actually the 206 CAN-bus is only useful for 4 communications: between BSI and injection ECU, between BSI and the under -steering wheel module, communication between BSI and on top screen and communication between BSI and dashboard.
There is not a real CAN-BUS system, which check the lights if are burned for exemple, which communicate with a back-computer that will switched lights etc..
It reduces the length of wires by about 15 meters, let' say. Or 15 meters of wires I think cheaper than implementing those computers for the CAN-bus.
It is indeed more pleasant to see on the screen "right rear door open" (or to have a graphical representation, depending on the type of screen), to see the warnings (hand brake on, etc.), but that's about all the benefit perceived by user.
The electrical system of 206, though slightly better made (undertakings, protection), is suffering from some cuts (many things on the same fuse, many electrically powered by BSI). For example if you burn the trunk lamp fuse you cannot start the car because the fuse for trunk light supply the power for under-steering wheel module that recognizes the key.
In cheap cars CAN BUS system is needed for real only if you have a stability program module installed, or you have quite an advanced diesel engine.
QUOTE(Ebrahim Hassanzadeh @ 23 Jan 2010, 22:12)
-206 SD has a better Handling than Logan.
That's debatable. Logan has a better suspension (more comfortable) and a better steering assistance. And in my opinion 206 SD is ugly.
QUOTE(Ebrahim Hassanzadeh @ 23 Jan 2010, 22:12)
-206 has a better design in and out than Logan.
Actually not many people buy logan because it has won a design contest...