Well, it's easy to mess up with the natural differencies between man and woman (and it would be a stupid thing to deny the fact that these differences do exist) and "level-up" the whole thing to, let's say, "because women are more likely to wear pink, they shouldn't be allowed to climb mount Everest".
My honest opinion is that on both sides (feminists and male chauvinists), the radical wings would better keep their mouth shut and search for alternative topics of spitting poison, because there's no chance for them to be right, not in this world and not in any other possible worlds.
I admire women who assume their feminine qualities rather than fighting a losing battle with them (and I like them even if they use those qualities to their advantage) and men who do not think that male-woman thing is the most important problem they have.
Besides this, my optimistic nature says that hard-talk is almost never hard-reality and things will bounce in their natural way of existence, once you leave your keyboard or your pencil and get together with your sweetheart (when of course, nothing abut the average Jane problem comes to mind
).
The male-female problem, at least the theoretical aspects of it are not a "long time solved problem" anywhere, because of its links to issues related to family values and such. BBC World had a recent show on this, few weeks ago.
But any radical idea is a bad idea, even if you use the "this is Balkan thinking" deteriorated argument in situations like "the oil price is rising - this is a freaking Balkan stupidity, because Romania shouldn't rise the price of oil, what does it have to do with the rest of the world?". Balkans are extremely similar with the rest of the world, Balkans are not the Atlantis, where there's a different race wearing white suits and singing with flutes about how unique they are in the eyes of the Universe.
Ok, even if you replace the white suits with black suits and flutes with angry electric guitars, the idea remains unchanged.